Bio-Digital Hijacking: How Hackers Could Exploit Wearable Biometric Data for Cyberattacks

SWARNALI GHOSH | DATE: MAY 12, 2025

Introduction

In an era where wearable technology tracks everything from heart rate to brainwave activity, our bodies are becoming the newest frontier for cybercrime. Hackers are no longer just after credit card numbers or passwords—they’re targeting the very biological signals that make us unique. This emerging threat, known as bio-digital hijacking, involves the malicious exploitation of biometric data collected by smart watches, fitness bands, and medical wearables. The consequences could be catastrophic: stolen fingerprints used to bypass security systems, manipulated heart rate data triggering false medical alerts, or even brainwave patterns being replicated to bypass neuro-authentication systems. As wearables grow more sophisticated, so do the risks.

The Rise of Wearable Technology and Its Hidden Vulnerabilities

Wearable technology has become an integral part of modern life, blending effortlessly into our everyday routines and activities. From fitness trackers monitoring our steps and heart rates to smartwatches managing our schedules and communications, these devices offer unparalleled convenience. However, as their adoption grows, so does the potential for cyber threats targeting the sensitive biometric data they collect. Wearable devices now monitor a vast array of biometric data-

Heart rate variability (HRV): Used in stress detection and fitness tracking.

Electrodermal activity (EDA): Measures sweat levels, often used in lie detection and emotional AI.

Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals: Neural activity signals utilized in brain-computer interfaces and identity verification systems.

Fingerprint and vein patterns: Embedded in smart rings for secure payments.

Voice and gait recognition: Used in behavioural biometrics for continuous authentication.

While these innovations enhance convenience and health monitoring, they also create new attack surfaces. A 2023 study by the University of Florida demonstrated that hackers could intercept ECG signals from a smartwatch and use them to spoof a user’s identity in biometric authentication systems.

Understanding Bio-Digital Hijacking

Bio-digital hijacking refers to the unauthorized access and exploitation of biometric data collected by wearable devices. This data includes fingerprints, heart rates, sleep patterns, and gait analysis. Such information can be used for identity theft, unauthorized surveillance, and more when compromised.

How Bio-Digital Hijacking Works

Data Interception and Replay Attacks: Many wearables transmit biometric data via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, often with weak encryption. Hackers can intercept this data and replay it to bypass security systems. For example, A stolen ECG signature could be used to unlock a biometric-secured safe. Captured gait patterns could mimic a user’s walk to gain access to restricted areas. A 2022 report by Kaspersky Lab found that some fitness trackers transmitted unencrypted data, making them easy targets for interception.

Manipulation of Health Data for Sabotage: Imagine a hacker altering a diabetic patient’s glucose monitor readings, causing an insulin pump to deliver a lethal dose. This isn’t science fiction—researchers at Black Hat 2018 demonstrated how an attacker could remotely manipulate a pacemaker’s signals.

Deepfake Biometrics and AI-Driven Spoofing: With advances in AI, hackers can now synthesize biometric data. For instance, A deepfake voiceprint could bypass voice authentication in banking apps. AI-generated fingerprint patterns could fool smartphone scanners. A study by NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering showed that AI could replicate fingerprints with 77% accuracy, posing a major risk to biometric security.

Ransomware Targeting Medical Wearables: Hospitals and individuals using implantable medical devices (IMDs)—such as pacemakers or neurostimulators—could face "medjacking" (medical device hijacking). Cybercriminals may seize control of essential devices and demand payment to restore access. In 2019, the FDA issued a warning about vulnerabilities in certain insulin pumps that could be remotely controlled by hackers.

Real-World Exploits: How Hackers Are Targeting Wearables

Eye-Tracking Vulnerabilities in AR Devices: Studies have shown that the eye-tracking capabilities of the Apple Vision Pro can be manipulated to infer the text users input on virtual keyboards. By analysing eye movements, attackers achieved up to 92.1% accuracy in reconstructing typed messages and 77% accuracy for passwords within five guesses.

Motion Sensors Revealing Keystrokes: Smartwatches equipped with accelerometers and gyroscopes can inadvertently record wrist movements associated with typing. A study demonstrated that these motion sensors could be used to decipher PINs and passwords with significant accuracy.

Deepfake Threats Amplified by Biometric Data: In 2024, a finance employee at British engineering firm Arup was deceived into transferring $25 million after a video call with a 'deepfake' CFO. Such incidents highlight how biometric data can be used to create convincing deepfakes, leading to significant financial losses.

Person Re-Identification Attacks: Even anonymized biometric data isn't safe.  Attackers have developed methods to re-identify individuals by analysing patterns in physiological data like heart rates and physical movements, posing significant privacy concerns.

Real-World Cases of Bio-Digital Hijacking

2017-Hackers Spoof ECG Authentication: Researchers at the University of Alabama demonstrated that ECG-based authentication could be fooled using a 3D-printed replica of a user’s heartbeat pattern.

2020-Fitness Tracker Data Used in Espionage: The U.S. military banned certain wearables after discovering that GPS data from soldiers’ devices was being used to track military bases.

2022-Brainwave Hacking in BCI Devices: A University of Washington study showed that hackers could extract sensitive information from brain-computer interface (BCI) headsets by analysing neural signals.

The Broader Implications of Biometric Data Breaches

Identity Theft and Fraud: Biometric information, unlike traditional passwords, cannot be changed once compromised. Once compromised, it can be used repeatedly for unauthorized access, making identity theft more persistent and harder to combat.

Medical Device Manipulation: Wearable medical devices like insulin pumps and pacemakers can be targeted by hackers. Unauthorized access could lead to altered dosages or disrupted functionality, posing life-threatening risks.

Data Monetization and Privacy Erosion: Companies may collect and sell biometric data to third parties without explicit user consent. This data can then be used for targeted advertising or even to influence insurance premiums.

Regulatory Landscape: While regulations like the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) aim to protect personal data, they often fall short in addressing the unique challenges posed by wearable technology. Many devices operate outside the purview of these regulations, leaving users vulnerable.

Protecting Yourself: Best Practices for Wearable Device Users

Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Whenever possible, activate MFA to add an extra layer of security.

Regularly Update Device Firmware: Manufacturers often release security patches; ensure your device is up-to-date.

Limit Data Sharing: Be cautious about granting permissions to third-party apps and regularly review privacy settings.

Use Strong, Unique Passwords: Avoid default passwords and consider using a password manager.

Be Aware of Your Digital Footprint: Understand what data your device collects and how it's stored or shared.

Enable Strong Encryption: Use wearables that support end-to-end encryption for biometric data transmission.

Disable Unnecessary Features: Turn off continuous Bluetooth/Wi-Fi when not in use to minimize exposure.

Use Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Avoid relying solely on biometrics—combine them with passwords or hardware keys.

Monitor for Anomalies: Check for irregular data spikes in health metrics, which could indicate tampering.

The Future of Bio-Digital Security

As biometric wearables evolve, so must cybersecurity measures. Emerging solutions include-

Quantum Encryption: Unbreakable data transmission using quantum key distribution (QKD).

Behavioural Anomaly Detection: AI that detects unusual biometric patterns in real time.

Decentralized Biometric Storage: Blockchain-based systems to prevent centralized data breaches.

Conclusion

As wearable technology continues to evolve, so do the methods employed by cybercriminals. Understanding the risks associated with biometric data and implementing proactive measures can help safeguard personal information. Both users and manufacturers must prioritize security to fully harness the benefits of wearable devices without compromising privacy. Bio-digital hijacking is no longer a futuristic threat—it’s happening now. From stolen heartbeats to brainwave replication, hackers are finding new ways to weaponize our biological data. As wearables become more integrated into daily life, users, manufacturers, and regulators must act swiftly to prevent a new wave of cyberattacks that target not just our devices but our very bodies.

Citations/References

1. Hasty, K., Gittleman, J. L., O’Connor, E. F., Hasty, K., Gittleman, J. L., & O’Connor, E. F. (2022, March 3). Cyber can now create biowarfare effects, without a bioweapon. Breaking Defense. https://breakingdefense.com/2022/02/cyber-can-now-create-biowarfare-effects-without-a-bioweapon/

2. Elgabry, M., & Johnson, S. (2024). Cyber-biological convergence: a systematic review and future outlook. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1456354

3. Silva-Trujillo, A. G., González, M. J. G., Pérez, L. P. R., & Villalba, L. J. G. (2023). Cybersecurity analysis of wearable devices: Smartwatches' passive attack. Sensors, 23(12), 5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23125438

4. Identity risks from biometric data collection. (2023, January 5). Beyond Trust. https://www.beyondtrust.com/blog/entry/is-your-identity-at-risk-from-biometric-data-collection

5. Alam, M. a. U. (2021, June 22). Person re-identification attack on wearable sensing. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11900

6. Shaw, J. (2025, January 28). Are current regulations adequate for ensuring the security of wearable data? Biometric Update | Biometrics News, Companies and Explainers. https://www.biometricupdate.com/202409/are-current-regulations-adequate-for-ensuring-the-security-of-wearable-data

7. Biometric and wearable data theft. (n.d.). Business-reporter.com. https://www.business-reporter.com/risk-management/biometric-and-wearable-data-theft

8. Burgess, M. (2015, December 21). Deep spying: Smartwatch eavesdropping to reveal PIN numbers. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/story/smartwatch-typing-spying/

9. Gini. (2013, September 16). Cyber threats to wearable health devices: Risks and prevention. https://gininow.com/blog/cyber-threats-to-wearable-health-devices-risks-and-prevention

10. Burgess, M. (2024, September 12). Apple Vision Pro’s eye tracking exposed what people type. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/story/apple-vision-pro-persona-eye-tracking-spy-typing/

11. Martin, K. (2022, December 28). Can biometrics be hacked? ID R&D. https://www.idrnd.ai/can-biometric-data-be-stolen/

12. Ribeiro, A. (2025, April 10). Forescout’s 2025 report reveals surge in device vulnerabilities across IT, IoT, OT, and IoMT. Industrial Cyber. https://industrialcyber.co/reports/forescouts-2025-report-reveals-surge-in-device-vulnerabilities-across-it-iot-ot-and-iomt/

Image Citations

1. How safe are connected vehicles really? | LinkedIn. (2019, September 4). https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-safe-connected-vehicles-really-natalie-sauber/

2. (7) Biohacking and its Security Implications in the Age of Converging Technologies | LinkedIn. (2024, June 11). https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/biohacking-its-security-implications-age-converging-ntichika-yyldf/

3. Contributor, L. N. O. (2024, August 1). The Hill. The Hill. https://thehill.com/opinion/cybersecurity/4804186-bio-hacking-cybersecurity-threats/

4. Conversation. (2020, September 4). Cybersecurity: Loopholes that lead to hacking even when 2FA is enabled. Firstpost. https://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/cybersecurity-loopholes-that-lead-to-hacking-even-when-2fa-is-enabled-8784391.html