Red Team vs. Blue Team: How Cybersecurity War Games Work

ARPITA (BISWAS) MAJUMDER | DATE: JULY 31, 2025

Introduction

In today’s rising tide of cyber‑threats, organizations are increasingly turning to cybersecurity war games—structured simulations pitting offense against defense—to sharpen their digital resilience. Known as Red Team vs. Blue Team exercises, these realistic drills immerse both sides in a battle of tactics, tools, and insight. Rather than summarizing, this article steps through each phase, explains real‑world examples, unpacks benefits and challenges, and explores emerging trends.

Origins: From Military Strategy to Cybersecurity Practice

Military roots: The concept originates in military exercises where Red Teams represented adversaries and Blue Teams friendly forces. The transition to cyber came naturally in the digital era.

Historic precedents: Notable exercises such as the U.S. “Eligible Receiver 97” demonstrated the power of simulated cyberattacks and led to the establishment of U.S. Cyber Command.

International evolution: NATO’s ongoing Locked Shields war game is now a flagship event, challenging national Blue Teams to defend critical infrastructure against simulated Red Team assaults.

Defining Red Team and Blue Team

Red Team: Composed of skilled ethical hackers, attackers whose goal is to simulate real adversaries. They use penetration testing, phishing, exploitation, and even physical breach attempts to probe vulnerabilities.

Blue Team: The defenders. Internal security staff are dedicated to detecting, responding to, and mitigating attacks in real time using SIEMs, firewalls, threat hunting, and incident response protocols.

Roles & Objectives

Red Team (Offensive Adversaries)

Real‑world simulation: Red Teams emulate the resources, tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by sophisticated threat actors—from nation‑states to advanced persistent threat groups.

Goal‑oriented infiltration: They breach systems using penetration testing, social engineering, phishing, credential theft, lateral movement, and stealth persistence—all under “red‑teaming” rules of engagement to avoid collateral damage.

Creative persistence: Only one successful exploit counts—even after dozens of failed attempts. This mirrors the mindset of actual attackers, honing unpredictability and persistence.

Blue Team (Defensive Guardians)

Continuous detection and response: Blue Teams monitor logs, network traffic, and system alerts to spot anomalies in real‑time and execute incident response protocols.

Hardening & remediation: Based on Red Team findings, Blue Teams enhance defences, update configurations, apply patches, improve logging, and refine policies.

Structure of a Cybersecurity War Game

Phase I: Planning & Rules of Engagement

White Team governance: A neutral White Team sets the scope: boundaries, timelines, off‑limits assets, escalation paths, safety protocols, legal oversight, and ethics.

Phase II: Reconnaissance & Attacks

Red Team plays adversary: Using OSINT, spear‑phishing, physical intrusion, or malware deployment based on MITRE ATT&CK or Cyber Kill Chain frameworks.

Blue Team monitors live: Logs, intrusion detection systems, and alerts are scrutinized for signatures, suspicious behavior, unusual access, or lateral movement.

Phase III: Engagement & Response

Real‑time detection vs stealth attacks: Blue Teams strive to detect beachheads, eliminate persistence, and contain lateral spread. Red Teams test both stealth (“surgical”) and broad (“carpet‑bombing”) tactics to evaluate coverage gaps.

Phase IV: Debrief & Purple Teaming

Detailed debrief: Both sides join forces in a Purple Team session to unpack what worked, what failed, and how defenses can be improved collaboratively.

Metrics & lessons learned: KPIs (e.g. time to detect, number of compromised hosts, coverage of MITRE ATT&CK tactics) will be evaluated. Recommendations feed into real‑world risk mitigation planning.

Purple Teaming: Bridging the Divide

Purple Teaming integrates Red and Blue efforts, converting confrontational exercises into a collaborative learning environment. Real‑time feedback and joint planning accelerate remediation and improve detection mechanisms on the fly.

Tools & Technologies in Use

Red Team Engines: Metasploit, Kali Linux, Burp Suite, Empire, Wireshark, social engineering toolkits—used to simulate advanced attacker TTPs.

Blue Team Arsenal: Splunk, Snort, OSSEC, SIEM platforms, firewalls, antivirus, threat‑hunting toolkits, and log analysis systems.

Benefits of Red vs. Blue Exercises

Realistic, adversarial testing: By using live TTPs, organizations get exposure to attack styles and detect blind spots in people, processes, and systems.

Crisis‑ready incident posture: Exercises sharpen response behaviour under simulated pressure and stress conditions. Damage, disruption, or exfiltration are controlled but instructive.

Compliance & resilience building: Regular exercises feed regulatory requirements (e.g., SOC‑2, ISO 27001) and support business continuity plans.

Cross‑pollination of expertise: Purple teaming blends offensive insights with defensive improvements, ensuring mitigation tactics evolve to meet current threats.

Real‑World Case Studies

NATO’s Locked Shields: A flagship annual exercise run by NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defense Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE) since 2010. Blue Teams from multiple nations defend against a Red Team simulating critical infrastructure assaults. The competition includes scoring and even legal‑media scenarios.

In one year, the U.S. Blue Team finished 12th out of 19, with teams from the Czech Republic and Estonia outperforming them. Attacks included drone control hijacking and simulated air‑base sabotage—realistic and chaotic environments for training.

Tri‑Sector Cyber Defense Drill (U.S., 2024): Companies across telecom, finance, and energy collaborated with CISA and government agencies in a multi-sector war game. Red and Blue Teams from different sectors cooperated, testing cross‐sector resilience, coordination, and incident response. This emphasised real‐world interdependencies.

Eligible Receiver 97: An early DOD scenario simulating Red Team intrusion into critical infrastructure and military command systems. Widely regarded as the founding moment behind the creation of U.S. Cyber Command.

Why These Exercises Matter: Benefits & Insights

Identifying Hidden Vulnerabilities: Simulating realistic threats exposes security gaps—technical, procedural, or human—that routine audits might miss.

Improving Incident Response: Blue Teams sharpen real‐time detection and reaction under pressure, reducing the impact of real breaches.

Communication & Teamwork: Exercises foster cross‑team coordination and communication, breaking silos between IT, security, and leadership.

Enhancing Security Awareness:

Employees gain an understanding of phishing, social engineering, and broader threat landscape through exposure to actual simulations.

Compliance & Audit: Organizations improve audit readiness by demonstrating active testing and incident preparedness.

Challenges & Pitfalls

Resource Intensive: Designing, staffing, and running exercises demands planning, expertise, and tools—which may be expensive.

Scope Creep: Without tight boundaries, exercises risk spiraling beyond manageable scale, overwhelming teams.

Fatigue Effects: Repetitive drills without recovery can exhaust staff and reduce effectiveness.

Emerging Trends & the Future of War Games

Automation & AI‑Driven Simulations: Generative AI tools can now craft realistic phishing campaigns, simulate advanced persistent threat behavior, and scale scenarios beyond manual capabilities.

Cyber Ranges: Virtual training environments like the DoD’s National Cyber Range Complex replicate large-scale, mixed Red/Blue/Gray environments at scale—from dozens to thousands of endpoints.

Ransomware Simulations: Events like Semperis’ ransomware war games simulate realistic chaos and multi-faceted disruption—requiring Blue Teams to adapt in near‑real time under unpredictable conditions.

Best Practices for Organizations

Establish Clear Goals & Rules Up Front: Define what systems, tactics, and boundaries are in play.

Document Every Phase: Meticulous record‑keeping of reconnaissance, attack vectors, detection timelines, and responses.

Facilitate Purple Team Debriefs: Ensure Red and Blue Teams collaborate post‑exercise—share lessons learned and remediation plans.

Rotating Scenarios: Alternate internal and external threats, phishing vs. network vs. physical breaches.

Regular Cadence: Move from periodic standalone Red Team engagements toward more continuous Blue Team operations integrated into a living security strategy.

Conclusion

Red Team vs. Blue Team cybersecurity war games are not mere drills—they are lifelike simulations of adversary tactics, designed to push both offense and defense to discover weaknesses, refine capabilities, and build resilience. Combined with Purple Team collaboration and increasingly enriched by AI and scalable cyber ranges, these exercises form the cutting edge of proactive defense. For modern organizations serious about staying ahead of evolving threats, structured war-game discipline is indispensable.

Citations/References

1. Team, K. C., Theron, D., & Team, K. C. (2025, July 7). Blue Team vs. Red Team in Cybersecurity: Differences Explained. Kelacyber. https://www.kelacyber.com/academy/cti/blue-team-vs-red-team-in-cybersecurity-differences-explained/

2. Razmi, R. (2023, October 11). Red and Blue Cyber Teams – A Tactical Arena! SecurityHQ. https://www.securityhq.com/blog/red-and-blue-cyber-teams-a-tactical-arena/

3. Khalil, M. (2025, May 2). Red Team vs Blue Team: Offense, Defense & Future of Cybersecurity. DeepStrike. https://deepstrike.io/blog/red-team-vs-blue-team-cybersecurity

4. SimSpace. (2024, October 1). Red Team vs. Blue Team | Cybersecurity Explained. SimSpace. https://simspace.com/blog/red-team-vs-blue-team-explained/

5. Red Team VS Blue Team: What’s the difference? | CrowdStrike. (n.d.). https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/cybersecurity-101/advisory-services/red-team-vs-blue-team/

6. Chindrus, C., & Caruntu, C. (2023). Securing the Network: A Red and Blue Cybersecurity Competition case study. Information, 14(11), 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14110587

7. Abuadbba, A., Hicks, C., Moore, K., Mavroudis, V., Hasircioglu, B., Goel, D., & Jennings, P. (2025, June 16). From Promise to Peril: Rethinking Cybersecurity Red and blue teaming in the age of LLMs. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13434

8. Bianchi, F., Bassetti, E., & Spognardi, A. (2024). Scalable and automated Evaluation of Blue Team cyber posture in Cyber Ranges. Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, 1539–1541. https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3636154

9. Maheshwari, M. (2023, April 24). An Overview: Red Team Vs Blue team – Securelayer7. SecureLayer7 - Offensive Security, API Scanner & Attack Surface Management. https://blog.securelayer7.net/red-team-vs-blue-team/

10. Priestman, K. (2023, June 7). Red Team vs Blue Team Exercise: Its Role in Finding Your Cybersecurity Flaws. Codemotion Magazine. https://www.codemotion.com/magazine/cybersecurity/red-team-vs-blue-team-exercise-its-role-in-finding-your-cybersecurity-flaws/

11. Wikipedia contributors. (2024, September 8). Locked shields. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locked_Shields

12. Rundle, J., & Mastercard. (2024, March 29). U.S. Public and Private Sectors Hold Joint Cyber Drill. WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-public-and-private-sectors-hold-joint-cyber-drill-0c4ab173

13. Wikipedia contributors. (2025, June 11). Eligible receiver 97. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eligible_Receiver_97

14. Kovalenko, O. (2024, December 19). Red Team vs Blue Team: How they Help Each Other | Iterasec. Your pragmatic cybersecurity partner. https://iterasec.com/blog/red-team-vs-blue-team-how-they-help-each-other/

15. Thelosthideout. (n.d.). How can generative AI transform red team exercises in cybersecurity? : r/redteamsec. https://www.reddit.com/r/redteamsec/comments/1i3a68d/how_can_generative_ai_transform_red_team/

16. SentinelOne. (2025, April 14). Red Team exercises in Cybersecurity: benefits & examples. SentinelOne. https://www.sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/services/red-team-exercise-in-cybersecurity/

Image Citations

1. How red and blue teams work together in cybersecurity. (2023, March 27). https://www.threatintelligence.com/blog/red-team-vs-blue-team

2. Capaciteam_Admin. (2025, May 28). Red Team vs Blue Team: Cyber Security 101. Capaciteam. https://capaciteam.com/red-team-vs-blue-team-cyber-security-101/

3. Anand, R. (2024, November 14). Ultimately, both Red and Blue Teams play vital roles in securing today’s digital landscape, and. . .. Medium. https://medium.com/@anandrishav2228/ultimately-both-red-and-blue-teams-play-vital-roles-in-securing-todays-digital-landscape-and-2ad19c30748d

4. Team, C. (2024, July 24). Blue Team vs. Red Team: Everything you need to know. CyberDefenders. https://cyberdefenders.org/blog/blue-team-vs-red-team/

5. SimSpace. (2024, October 1). Red Team vs. Blue Team | Cybersecurity Explained. SimSpace. https://simspace.com/blog/red-team-vs-blue-team-explained/

6. Cye, & Cye. (2025, June 30). Red Team vs. Blue Team Cybersecurity. CYE - Quantify and Manage Your Cyber Exposure. https://cyesec.com/blog/red-team-vs-blue-team-cybersecurity-they-can-help-your-business

   
   

About the Author

Arpita (Biswas) Majumder is a key member of the CEO's Office at QBA USA, the parent company of AmeriSOURCE, where she also contributes to the digital marketing team. With a master’s degree in environmental science, she brings valuable insights into a wide range of cutting-edge technological areas and enjoys writing blog posts and whitepapers. Recognized for her tireless commitment, Arpita consistently delivers exceptional support to the CEO and to team members.