Cyber Threats in Drone Delivery Networks: How Hackers Could Hijack Autonomous Logistics
- Shilpi Mondal
- 3 days ago
- 12 min read
SHILPI MONDAL| DATE: NOVEMBER 21,2025
From coffee and groceries to blood samples and critical medicines, drones are fast becoming the “last mile” workhorses of modern logistics. Companies from Amazon to Zipline, Wing, UPS Flight Forward and countless startups are betting that small autonomous aircraft will weave through cities and suburbs, dropping packages with near-zero human touch.
But there’s a harsh truth buried under the sleek marketing videos: drone delivery networks are also a brand-new, highly exposed cyber-physical attack surface. If a drone is just a flying robot connected to the internet, then hijacking that robot or the network that coordinates thousands of them becomes a tempting prize for cybercriminals, extortion gangs, hostile states and thrill-seeking hackers.
This article dives deep into how cyber threats could hijack autonomous logistics systems, what that means in practice, and what regulators, operators and technology providers must do now before “just one compromised drone” turns into “a compromised fleet.”
How Drone Delivery Networks Actually Work
To understand how they can be hacked, we need to understand what’s under the hood. A modern drone delivery ecosystem typically includes:
The drone itself
Flight controller & onboard computer: Runs autopilot, navigation, collision avoidance, and sometimes AI-based vision systems.
Sensors: Like GPS or GNSS units, plus IMUs, hook up with cameras - also LiDAR, radar, barometers, or even sound detectors now and then.
Radio systems: LTE or 5G, along with Wi-Fi, custom wireless signals, even satellites - these handle control commands plus data feedback.
Payload systems: Winch mechanisms, cargo bays, temperature control for medical goods, etc.Each of these components has firmware and software that can harbor vulnerabilities.
Ground systems & cloud
Fleet-management platforms: Cloud services that plan routes, push updates, and monitor every drone in real time.
Operations centers: Where human supervisors oversee hundreds of flights via dashboards.
Edge & base stations: Rooftop “nests” or docks with chargers, antennas, and sometimes local compute units for routing and health checks.
These systems are classic IT targets: web APIs, databases, authentication systems, VPNs, and internal dashboards.
Traffic management and regulators
When flights happen out of sight, the sky gets busier. Tools such as UTM help drones steer clear of each other by adjusting height, order, or restricted spots. In the U.S., green lights from the FAA for companies like Zipline and Wing - alongside matching rules in Europe and beyond - are moving regular BVLOS use forward.
If a hacker slips fake info into the UTM system or sneaks through its openings - it’s not only about taking over one drone; it's more like warping the flow of every airborne delivery link tied to that grid.
Why Hijacking Drone Logistics Is So Attractive
The motives for attacking drone delivery networks are varied and powerful:
Financial extortion
Ransomware crews could warn they’ll wreck drones, mess up daily runs or spill secret shipping info if the target won’t pay up.
Research on cyber risk loss distribution suggests that large-scale attacks on drone delivery networks could lead to substantial aggregate losses across many nodes, from damaged drones to cascading service outages.
Cargo theft but also smuggling
Hijack a drone while it's flying, send it somewhere else using remote access - grab expensive stuff like gadgets or medicine, maybe even digital cash once it lands.
Criminals might sneak drones in to drop off illegal stuff or gear for breaking into systems - this’s happened before when hackers plopped custom Wi-Fi gadgets on office rooftops to grab login details.
Kinetic harm and sabotage
A drone is a flying kinetic object. Redirect one into crowds, airports, power substations, pipelines or chemical facilities and you have a weaponized logistics platform.
Defence oriented analyses warn that drone hijacking can be used to weaponize systems, including feed switching and flight path control for hostile purposes.
Espionage & data theft
Drones collect video, sensor data, and sometimes customer or operational data in transit.
Hijacking communication links or storage services could expose sensitive delivery patterns, client lists, or location data of high-value targets.
Geopolitical leverage & critical infrastructure disruption
On a countrywide level, taking over or knocking out big vehicle groups might mess up hospital supplies, crisis aid delivery, or fast-paced distribution networks.
Experts are worried - relying on drones built overseas could risk safety, while more thefts keep happening.
The Core Cyber Threats to Drone Delivery Networks
GPS spoofing: steering drones with fake skies
Commercial drones rely mostly on GNSS - GPS, for example - to get around. So they’re at high risk from GPS spoofing; hackers send out phony signals that fool the drone’s system.
Academic reviews describe how civil GPS can be spoofed with relatively affordable hardware, allowing attackers to misdirect or fully hijack UAVs.
More recent work and field reports show spoofing is not theoretical: it’s been used in conflict zones to mislead or crash drones and even manned aircraft navigation.
In a delivery network, GPS spoofing can:
Slowly drift drones off course to a capture point.
Nudge them into no-fly zones, triggering regulatory scrutiny or automatic failsafes that ground fleets.
Cause controlled landings in attacker-controlled areas by faking the “home” location.
Command-and-control (C2) hijacking
Drones send info to base units using radio signals - sometimes Wi-Fi if they’re small, sometimes custom frequencies or cell networks like 4G or 5G.These links can be:
Eavesdropped: to harvest telemetry, routes, or encryption keys.
Manipulated: injecting malicious commands.
Taken over: by replaying or forging control packets if authentication is weak.
Security checks plus alerts from makers say open C2 links might let hackers take over drones completely - camera, cargo, route included.
Tests in everyday situations proved:
Some consumer drones got taken over because their Wi-Fi was unsecured or had weak passwords.
Small drones losing signal or being taken over, whether piloted by hand or on auto-pilot.
In a delivery network where a single operator might supervise hundreds of semi-autonomous drones, one compromised ground system or VPN account can become a pivot point to entire fleets.
Jamming and denial-of-service
Jamming is cruder than spoofing, but brutally effective:
Radio interference might break drone control signals - so they’ll hover, head back, or touch down on their own. Instead of staying online, they react automatically when contact’s lost. No signal means no remote commands, so built-in safety steps kick in right away.
GPS signals blocked might mess up navigation, causing odd actions, wrong turns, or forced landings.
Research into drone safety shows weak jam resistance leaves groups open to small, low-cost blockers messing up whole routes. Instead of solid backup plans, these systems often fail when hit by simple interference tools. Some experts highlight how easily operations collapse if signals get scrambled nearby.
Attacks on AI and autonomy: fooling “smart” drones
As drone delivery networks become more autonomous, they lean on AI for:
Obstacle detection and avoidance
Computer vision–based landing, docking and “follow-me” functions
Dynamic route planning in dense urban airspace
This creates new attack surfaces:
Adversarial examples & sensor spoofing
A 2025 USENIX paper on UAV “follow-me” systems showed how carefully crafted motion trajectories can trick vision models into following the attacker instead of the intended target.
Similar techniques could mislead drones into mis-classifying obstacles or landing zones, causing unsafe landings or route changes.
Model and data poisoning
If an attacker accesses the training pipeline or over-the-air model update channels, they can inject biased data or malicious models.
AI-driven defenses vs AI-driven attackers
New work highlights both the potential and vulnerabilities of AI-powered UAV systems unauthorized access, model theft, and manipulation of AI decision-making layers are all in scope.
The paradox: we rely on AI to make drone operations safer and more scalable, but AI itself becomes a prime target.
Supply chain, firmware and cloud exploitation
Drone delivery is a complex mesh of hardware and software from different vendors:
Flight controllers, GPS modules, batteries, cameras, radios, and base stations often come from third parties.
Cloud APIs and analytics platforms integrate weather, mapping, customer data and payment systems.
Security guidance on unmanned aircraft systems emphasizes:
Firmware backdoors and outdated libraries in components.
Bad or hacked updates sent through unsafe ways.
Cloud setup errors - like open S3 storage, loose IAM rules, or public dashboards.
If one hacker hits a maker, connected company, or patch hub, they could quietly reach tons of drones and their bases from behind.
Attacks on UTM and ecosystem infrastructure
As regulators move toward large-scale BVLOS operations, new rules bring new systems and new attack surfaces.
A 2025 U.S. FAA & TSA proposal would require drone operators, manufacturers, and UTM data service providers to implement formal cybersecurity programs, including risk assessments and incident response.
UTM systems will ingest and broadcast large volumes of real-time positional data and authorizations.
If an attacker can:
Inject false traffic into UTM, they may cause near-collisions, route disruptions, or overconcentration of drones in specific corridors.
Deny service to UTM (e.g., API overload), they may force fleets into fallback modes that curtail operations.
In a fully mature drone logistics ecosystem, UTM becomes as critical and as attack-worthy as a financial market’s matching engine.
Real-World Research & Incidents: Proof That Hijacking Is Possible
Even before fully commercial drone delivery at scale, research and incidents have shown what is possible.
AR.Drone 2.0 hacks: Security researchers have demonstrated how consumer drones with unsecured Wi-Fi and open ports can be taken over in mid-flight, altering their trajectory and video feed.
Jamming and hijacking micro aerial drones: Experimental work on micro-drones showed effective jamming and command hijacking of both autonomous and operator-controlled flights, emphasizing the need for shielding strategies.
Follow-me hacks using tricky movements: Scientists found that doing specific motions lets someone fool tracking tech, shifting the drone’s focus from the real user to themselves, basically taking control by mimicking movement patterns.
Roof-top Wi-Fi hacking using drones: Security experts found a major incident where hackers flew drones onto a business rooftop, dropped custom gear that grabbed login details, then got inside private networks.
Rising fake GPS signals in war areas: Studies from Ukraine and elsewhere show these tricks mess up drone navigation, proving how shaky systems relying on satellite timing really are.
Measuring hacking risks in drone shipping: Fresh models guess total losses from various cyber threats during delivery flights, giving solid numbers that help insurance folks and crews plan better.
Mid-flight hijack detection systems: In 2025, Florida International University researchers announced “SHIELD,” a mid-flight defense system that uses machine learning to detect hijacking attempts and anomalous behavior in real time.
Taken together, these examples show that hijacking is not a hypothetical “someday” risk—many of the building blocks already exist in the wild.
What Happens When a Drone Network Gets Hijacked?
Think beyond a single lost drone. In a dense, commercial network, hijacking can ripple through multiple layers:
Tactical impact (minutes to hours)
Crashed or stolen drones and cargo
Emergency flight suspensions across regions
Airspace congestion as drones hold or return to base
Operational impact (days to weeks)
Route closures or regulatory pauses in specific corridors
Overtime costs for human drivers stepping in
Incident response, forensic analysis, patching and re-certification
Strategic impact (months to years)
Regulatory backlash, stricter requirements and slower approval of BVLOS operations
Insurance premium hikes, revised underwriting assumptions for cyber-physical exposure
Reputational damage: customers reluctant to trust “flying couriers” with sensitive goods
The more autonomous and interconnected the system, the more it behaves like a networked financial system: local shocks can cascade globally.
Defending Drone Delivery Networks: From Single Drone to Full Ecosystem
No single control can “solve” hijacking. A robust strategy combines technical, operational and regulatory layers.
Security by design for drones
Strong cryptography for C2 and telemetry
Make sure drones and ground stations verify each other through certs or up-to-date key methods.
Go for full-path encryption that changes keys automatically instead of fixed shared ones.
Hardened firmware and secure boot
Signed firmware images and secure boot chains prevent attackers from installing modified system images.
Lock down debug interfaces (JTAG, UART, USB) in production.
Defense against GPS spoofing
Multi-sensor fusion uses GPS, IMU, a barometer, or visual odometry to catch odd shifts in location or motion.
Try using GPS from different satellite groups while also tapping into verified signal sources when you can get them.
Real-time spoofing detection methods using machine learning on GPS/IMU patterns are promising and should be operationalized.
Resilience to jamming
Spectrum-smart radios switching from LTE to 5G, or hopping on satellites when needed - also linking through nearby mesh setups if required.
Stable backup mode: if trouble hits, it hovers steady or steers toward a clear spot to land - no sudden drops.
Model security for AI-driven features
Safe ways to update models - using checks like digital signatures, confirming changes, plus guards against reverting.
Testing object detection by challenging it - like simulating attacks with tricky visual patterns. Trying out landing systems under pressure - using fake threats to check performance.
Securing fleet management and cloud infrastructure
Zero-trust architecture across control planes
Robust controls for user access - using two-step verification while limiting permissions to only what’s needed.
Fine-tuned splits in vehicle tracking, smart insights, or info handling for users.
Secure APIs
Hardened authentication and throttling for route planning, status queries, and UTM interactions.
Continuous security testing (SAST/DAST) and bug bounty programs for cloud services.
Robust logging and anomaly detection
Behavioral models that baseline normal flight patterns, communication rates, and operator actions and raise alerts on deviations.
Integrate telemetry with SIEM/XDR platforms so that drone events appear alongside broader enterprise threats.
UTM and regulatory defenses
NIST-aligned cybersecurity frameworks for UAS
Emerging FAA/TSA proposals point toward requiring operators and UTM providers to adopt formal cybersecurity programs aligned with NIST standards risk assessments, incident response, continuous monitoring.
Secure data sharing across the ecosystem
End-to-end integrity protection for position, intent and authorization messages in UTM.
Strict authentication of all actors: operators, service providers, drones and regulators.
Mandatory reporting and coordinated response
Clear rules for reporting hijacking attempts, spoofing incidents and near-misses.
Shared threat intelligence feeds specifically for UAS ecosystems.
Insurance, risk modeling and governance
Quantitative cyber risk modeling
Work like Chiaradonna et al.’s aggregate loss models for drone delivery networks helps operators, regulators and insurers estimate expected loss under various attack scenarios.
This directly informs premium pricing, reserve planning, and ROI on security investments.
Specialized insurance products
Insurers are already experimenting with coverage for cyber-driven drone hijacking and associated damages.
Board-level oversight
For major logistics and e-commerce players, drone delivery risk should be explicitly addressed in enterprise risk management (ERM) and board cyber-risk dashboards.
Training & operational discipline
Even the most secure drone hardware can be undermined by weak human practices:
Operator training on hijacking indicators (unexpected route changes, telemetry anomalies, unexplained failsafes).
Playbooks for safe recovery: when to immediately land, when to return to base, when to notify regulators and customers.
Red-teaming plus drills that mimic GPS tricks, signal blocking, or command hijacks - checks full response from start to finish.
The Future: Securing an Airspace Full of Autonomous Couriers
The trajectory is clear:
Folks studying the market say drone deliveries will expand fast - mostly in North America - even though hackers could slow things down. While demand rises, safety worries tag along behind.
Regulators across the globe are shifting slowly toward regular BVLOS flights, even as they start shaping cyber rules for drones, pilots, or air traffic setups.
Scientists are scrambling to keep up - crafting live threat alerts along with smarter security powered by machine learning.
So, pushing self-driving trucks means you’ve got to lock them down fast - otherwise someone else might beat you to safety. Drone delivery will only gain public trust if every flight is backed by:
Tamper-resistant hardware
Cryptographically strong communication
Intelligent, AI-aware defenses
Clear rules that work well but also bounce back when tested
The skies soon might swarm with self-flying delivery bots - yet who really runs them, owners or hidden hackers, hinges on choices we’re making today.
Citations:
Daleo, J. (2023, September 21). Zipline secures key operational approval for drone package deliveries. FreightWaves. https://www.freightwaves.com/news/zipline-secures-key-operational-approval-for-drone-package-deliveries?
Khan, S. Z., Mohsin, M., & Iqbal, W. (2021). On GPS spoofing of aerial platforms: a review of threats, challenges, methodologies, and future research directions. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e507. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.507
McNabb, M. (2023, September 19). FAA authorizes zipline for drone delivery beyond visual line of sight. DRONELIFE. https://dronelife.com/2023/09/19/faa-authorizes-zipline-for-drone-delivery-beyond-visual-line-of-sight/?
Chiaradonna, S., Jevtić, P., & Lanchier, N. (2024). Cyber risk loss distribution for various scale drone delivery systems. Risk Sciences., 1, 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.risk.2024.100009
Tripathi, L. C. N. (2025, January 24). Emerging threats of drone feed hijacking: Strategic implications for Indian defence. raksha-anirveda.com. https://raksha-anirveda.com/drone-hijacking-threats-impact-on-defence/?srsltid=AfmBOorVXHNFY6oAKMgF5XGeNAIJega2axP3GiRzVvRdvGh1gMBJhMF3&utm
Exploring jamming and hijacking attacks for micro aerial drones. (n.d.). https://arxiv.org/html/2403.03858v1
Alsadie, D. (2025). Cybersecurity and artificial intelligence in unmanned aerial vehicles: emerging challenges and advanced countermeasures. IET Information Security, 2025(1). https://doi.org/10.1049/ise2/2046868
FIU cybersecurity researchers develop midflight defense against drone hijacking. (2025, October 7). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1101091
Mohammed, U. M., Omolara, A. E., Abiodun, O. I., Rasheed, J., Osman, O., Lar, P. M., Adeyinka, P. O., & Olugbenga, A. G. (2025). Cyber threat in drone systems: bridging real-time security, legal admissibility, and digital forensic solution readiness. Frontiers in Communications and Networks, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frcmn.2025.1661928
Al-Sabbagh, A., El-Bokhary, A., El-Koussa, S., Jaber, A., & Elkhodr, M. (2025). Enhancing UAV security against GPS spoofing attacks through a genetic Algorithm-Driven Deep Learning framework. Information, 16(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16020115
Li, J., Brewington, J., Zhang, Q., Mao, Z. M., & University of Michigan. (2025). WIP: Hijacking Attacks on UAV Follow-Me systems in realistic scenarios. In Proceedings of the 3rd USENIX Symposium on Vehicle Security and Privacy [Conference-proceeding]. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/vehiclesec25-li-jiarui.pdf?
Crowell & Moring LLP. (n.d.). Hacker No fly Zone: FAA and TSA propose cybersecurity rules for drone ecosystem. Crowell & Moring - Hacker No Fly Zone: FAA and TSA Propose Cybersecurity Rules for Drone Ecosystem. https://www.crowell.com/en/insights/client-alerts/hacker-no-fly-zone-faa-and-tsa-propose-cybersecurity-rules-for-drone-ecosystem?
Exploring jamming and hijacking attacks for micro aerial drones. (n.d.). https://arxiv.org/html/2403.03858v1?
Drone package delivery market in North America: Forecast & analysis. (n.d.). https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/blog/AD/drone-package-delivery-market-in-north-america?
Avantika. (2024, March 15). The game of drones of hovering cybersecurity risks. The Cyber Express. https://thecyberexpress.com/drones-hacking-hovering-cybersecurity-risks/
Federal Aviation Administration. (2024). Notice of proposed rulemaking: Beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operations [PDF]. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/BVLOS_NPRM_website_version.pdf
OPSGROUP. (2024). GPS spoofing final report: Working group OG24 [PDF]. OPSGROUP. https://ops.group/dashboard/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GPS-Spoofing-Final-Report-OPSGROUP-WG-OG24.pdf
Image citation:
Cybersecurity Challenges in Drone-Based Systems | Anvil Labs. (n.d.). https://anvil.so/post/cybersecurity-challenges-in-drone-based-systems
Avantika. (2024, March 15). The game of drones of hovering cybersecurity risks. The Cyber Express. https://thecyberexpress.com/drones-hacking-hovering-cybersecurity-risks/
Figure 1. Scenario of GPS spoofing attack on a UAV. A UAV takes off. . . (n.d.). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Scenario-of-GPS-spoofing-attack-on-a-UAV-A-UAV-takes-off-from-the-starting-position-and_fig1_365229005
Alsadie, D. (2025). Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Emerging Challenges and Advanced Countermeasures. IET Information Security, 2025(1). https://doi.org/10.1049/ise2/2046868
Comments